World Prehistory: Class 19
Andes: Late Preceramic through Early Horizon
ã
Copyright Bruce Owen 2000
- Setting
- The Andes are extremely ecologically and culturally varied
- A narrow band of high, rough Andes mountains runs right along the west coast of South America
- the rest of the continent to the east of the Andes is low, gentle terrain sloping very gradually through the Amazonian forest to the Atlantic
- narrow coastal strip
- the coast is extremely dry desert
- often cloudy, even foggy, but extremely little actual rain
- The coastal desert is cut by many short, steep, narrow river valleys
- western slopes of the Andes
- dry, very steep, barren to scrubby
- cut by the upper parts of the coastal valleys
- the high, wide crest of the Andes
- not a single row of peaks, but a broad band of mountains, valleys, and high plateaus
- the high valleys, especially the "intermontaine" valleys that run parallel to the spine of the Andes, contain good farmland
- even the floors of these valleys are high (2,800-3,500 meters; 9,000 - 12,000 feet)
- outside the intermontaine valley floors and lower slopes, the higher slopes and plateaus are covered with open grasslands called puna
- 3,500 - 4,500 meters (12,000 - 15,000 feet)
- good for herding llamas and alpacas, and hunting guanacos and vicuñas
- the rocky, snowcapped peaks of the Andes stick up from the puna
- eastern side slopes steeply and very roughly down towards the edge of the jungle
- these eastern slopes are where the famous Inka site of Machu Picchu is
- huge, almost flat Amazonian jungle stretches the rest of the way to the Atlantic
- Early occupation of the Andes
- Early hunters and gatherers came across the Bering Strait
- and spread south through North America and into the Andes by at least 12,000 BC
- Preceramic period
- Agriculture was developed and adopted extremely gradually, with different preferred crops and different timing in different ecological zones
- beans and hot chili peppers were collected more intensively, possibly began to be domesticated, around 9000 BC, maybe even a little earlier
- quinoa (a grain), squash, peanuts in the north by around 7000 BC
- maybe maize (corn) by 7000 BC in Ecuador, but not much
- camelids (llamas, alpacas) domesticated maybe by 6500 BC
- potatoes, coca maybe by 5000 BC
- a little maize in various places in Peru by 4500 BC
- cotton maybe around 3500 BC
- semi-sedentary people, using minor agriculture to supplement hunted, gathered, and fished foods
- Late Preceramic (also called "Cotton Preceramic") roughly 3000-2000 BC
- Same time as:
- Jemdet Nasr, Early Dynastic, Agade in Mespotamia
- Early Dynastic, Old Kingdom, 1st Intermediate in Egypt
- Long before the Olmecs or Zapotecs started building ceremonial architecture in Mesoamerica
- Coastal Late Preceramic sites
- mostly modest villages of people who fished and gathered shellfish
- plus a little supplemental farming, especially for cotton for lines and nets, and gourds for net floats and containers
- technology and lifestyle not too different from Native Americans of the Bay Area
- But a few sites were different, like Aspero
- Aspero featured 9 to 11 flat-topped mounds ("huacas")
- made by modifying natural hills
- "Huaca" means a sacred place, usually an artificial platform mound, but sometimes a peak, a special rock outcrop, etc.
- Huaca de los Sacrificios 2903 BC radiocarbon date, first construction probably up to 200 years older (3100 BC?)
- this was some 200 to 400 years before the first Egyptian pyramid, the stepped pyramid of Djoser (2686 BC)
- Huaca de los Idolos 2750 BC, probably started a few centuries earlier (2900 BC??)
- on a platform 10 m high (32 feet), 30 X 40 m base (about 100 X 130 feet)
- top covered by rooms, insides plastered and painted red and yellow
- stairway up the front to a central entrance
- central room divided by a wall with "clapboard" pattern molded on the outer surface, with T-shaped doorway
- next to it, but entered by a separate system of hallways, a room with a central niche opposite the entryway, with a bench or altar built up to the level of the base of the niche
- the "Idolos" are at least 13 intentionally broken figurines found in one of the niches (carefully filled for a later reconstruction)
- other offerings include yarn "god's eyes", and a colorful "feather arrangement"
- Aspero did have a modest town around it, maybe enough to have built the site over a long period of time
- El Paraiso
- dates to the very end of the coastal preceramic and into the next period; earliest date 2000 BC
- 58 ha complex
- mounds up to three stories high
- irregular plan suggests accumulation over a long time
- restored platform is 8 m (26 feet) high
- central court with red clay floor, red painted walls, and four 1-meter diameter fire pits around a sunken central area
- total over 100,000 tons of rock fill
- estimated 2 million person-days to construct
- number of people who lived there or nearby is debated
- relatively little evidence of residence, but some burned midden layers suggest to some investigators that there were many people there
- otherwise, the building projects might have had to draw people from various settlements in the area
- Generalities of the coastal Late Preceramic
- stratification
- few goods that could not be produced by any household
- no markedly elite burials, although some were definitely richer than others
- at site of Asia, 28 burials
- most had 2 to 4 textiles
- a few had more
- one had 12, plus various gourds, bone tools, wooden tubes, a comb, a sling, etc.
- monumental architecture
- big labor mobilization without any sign of an elite or state organization
- no significant storage features or craft workshops
- i.e. no obvious economic function (unlike Mesopotamia, Indus)
- not residential (un like Mesopotamia, China)
- not mainly mortuary (un like Egypt)
- mainly used for ritual (like Olmec and Maya)
- how could such monuments be possible without:
- much agriculture
- notable social stratification that would suggest leaders
- concentration and redistribution of surplus
- cities, warfare, craft specialization...??
- a possible alternative to stratification: "cargo" system
- "cargo" = "responsibility" or "task" assigned to someone
- rotating capable people through offices of leadership
- this is a way to coordinate group activities (like building monuments) without establishing a permanent status hierarchy
- although people who have successfully completed numerous cargos become generally more respected and important
- suggested because it is still in common use in the Andes
- can we project this 4000+ years into the past? Not for sure, but we can at least suggest.
- Initial Period 2000-800 BC
- so called because it was the time of the first (initial) use of ceramics
- these dates fall around the end of the latest periods we looked at in Mesopotamia and Egypt
- subsistence shifted from mostly marine resources to more irrigated agriculture, as people moved further up into the coastal segments of the river valleys
- root crops (potatoes, oca, ulluco, manioc [yuca] etc.) plus beans, squashes, fruits
- maize still rare or absent on the coast, just appearing in the highlands
- no consensus on why they shifted to depend more on irrigated crop production
- they began making ceramic vessels, maybe for boiling starchy crops
- organization
- highly variable, regional (patchy) pottery styles suggest lots of small, closed, self-sufficient groups
- the larger valleys had several ceremonial centers at this time, each center apparently associated with a small, local canal system and the people living on the land that it watered
- the canal systems were still of a scale that a village could manage
- much greater elaboration of monumental architecture
- similar in concept to the Late Preceramic, but
- many more ceremonial sites
- much bigger and more elaborate constructions
- continued the practice of repeated interment and rebuilding
- structures started to feature large adobe friezes, often painted in bright colors, visible to crowds in plazas
- U-shaped mound complexes (Initial period, 2000 - 800 BC)
- About 20 major U-shaped complexes known
- U-shaped arrangement of central and flanking mounds with interior plaza
- stairway up the center front, forming a dramatic entrance to the top of the main mound
- Huaca la Florida
- 1750-1650 BC
- 6.7 million person-days, not including leveling the area, plastering, modeling, and painting the outsides
- And there are others even larger!
- Plazas up to 30 ha!
- Las Haldas
- another large Initial period U-shaped mound complex
- Cardal
- A smaller U-shaped center
- entrance stairway flanked by painted clay frieze of a gigantic mouth with interlocking teeth and canines 1 m long
- painted cream, yellow, red, and black
- small habitation areas nearby
- contemporary with similar centers, one just 1 km away, another 5 km away
- suggests that small groups built and used them
- on top of central mound, several burials
- both male and female
- presumably important people
- but grave goods were limited: a few ordinary ceramics; one old man had a necklace of sea lion teeth and earspools made from porpoise vertebrae
- Garagay
- 1640-900 BC
- 3.2 million person-days
- painted relief of shaman (?) using a hallucinogen?
- Huaca de los Reyes
- further north on the coast
- U-shaped complex with colonnades facing three sides of a main rectangular plaza
- facades had large, modeled clay sculptures of anthropomorphic heads with fangs, toothy feline mouths, etc, painted in green, cream, and black
- estimated 960 person-years to build
- Generalizations about the Initial period coastal U-shaped mound tradition
- social stratification
- some elite burials, but "elite" did not have a lot of fancy goods
- some residences on top of main mound at Cardal would presumably be for elites
- but their refuse was like that in ordinary houses
- i.e. weak stratification
- maybe a cargo system?
- or acquired, not hereditary status, so that wealth did not accumulate over generations in certain families?
- no signs of large settlements over a few thousand people
- in the Initial period Casma valley: an extreme case
- Sechín Alto
- oldest date is 1720 BC, construction presumably started even earlier
- Twice the volume of Huaca La Florida
- over 13 million person-days to build
- that is 36,000 person-years (without weekends off!)
- (still only one eleventh of the estimate for the great pyramid at Giza: 400,000 person-years)
- final form reflects around 1000 years of rebuilding!
- incredible cultural conservatism, comparable to Mesopotamian temples
- 250 x 300 m at base (7.5 ha, bigger than the entire town of Jericho!)
- base is bigger than the Great Pyramid at Giza or the Pyramid of the Sun at Teotihuacan
- this single platform mound would cover the entire SSU main quad and all of Stevenson, Darwin, and the library
- 44 m tall (143 feet) at highest point
- area in front of main mound:
- four successive rectangular courts
- 3 with sunken circular plazas
- total 1.4 km long (close to a mile long!)
- Cerro Sechín
- much smaller than Sechín Alto
- not a mound or U-shaped structure, but a room complex at the foot of a hill
- originally adobe, with large cats and fish modeled and painted on the front at different times
- stone sculpture wall built around 1520 BC, after numerous earlier rebuildings and expansions
- What does the wall mean?
- "Medical school" (not very likely)
- Warfare?
- residential sites were not defensible at this time
- sites were on flat land near irrigable areas, not on hilltops or ridges
- they did not have defensive walls
- and no other evidence of significant warfare
- like lots of burials with traumatic injuries
- or lots of weapons in burials or other contexts
- maybe warfare was real but rare?
- or even so rare as to be a historical to mythical memory?
- or it was some sort of ritualized conflict different from our concept of warfare, such that defenses were not appropriate?
- the Andean concept of tinku
- scheduled, organized fight between villages or descent groups
- often resulting in real injuries or deaths
- Pampa de las Llamas / Moxeke (2000 - 1500 BC) (Still Casma valley)
- about 200 ha!
- over twice the area of the entire SSU campus!
- a complex with two big mounds connected by plazas, and a lot of smaller ceremonial and residential buildings
- Moxeke main mound
- stepped pyramid/platform mound
- 160 x 170 m at base (a bit over a third the area of Sechín Alto)
- would cover most of the main SSU quad and library
- 30 m high (98 feet)
- 10 m (33 feet) up on the sides were huge painted sculptures in niches, clearly for viewing from the ground
- front had huge niches occupied by sculptural figures
- presumably the setting for ceremonies mean to be appreciated by a sizable crowd located in the plaza
- Huaca A
- very different from Moxeke main mound
- broad platform with a complex of rooms on top with very high walls (4-7 m, roughly 16 feet), many with niches
- mostly built of fieldstones set in mortar, with surfaces plastered and painted white
- 136 m x 119 m (a little smaller than Moxeke main mound)
- originally painted white, with huge feline (cat) paintings around entrance
- no evidence that people lived in Huaca A
- no hearths, no food garbage
- the rooms were for storage?
- very little evidence of what would have been stored there
- not surprising; if it had any value, it would have been removed
- pollen from niches suggests cotton, beans, potatoes, peanuts
- rodent bones also suggest storage
- administrative rooms?
- Numerous platforms along the edges of the huge plaza between Huaca A and Moxeke main mound
- some had residences behind them, built in the fieldstone and mortar style of Huaca A
- these were presumably residences of the elite who were associated with the attached platform mound
- but the garbage in these residences is similar to the plainer ones further from the plaza
- so does the architectural difference indicate a status hierarchy, or not?
- low-status housing a little further away from Huaca A and the plaza
- perishable buildings, with probably cane walls set along stone footings
- less regular plans
- hearths smaller
- not connected to or aligned with public architecture
- domestic refuse similar to the better-built residences
- generalities about the Initial period Casma valley
- no craft workshops known, nor fine goods that would imply craft specialists
- except the sculptures, paintings, and buildings themselves
- no really large concentrations of population
- no large-scale irrigation works
- still no impressive elite burials
- But--
- huge monumental architecture
- maybe storage at Huaca A
- possibly higher-status residences associated with the fancy buildings
- So, was it a complex society, or even a state?
- Crisis on the coast: 900 - 700 BC
- end of Initial Period - beginning of Early Horizon
- coastal people started growing maize, maybe introduced from the highlands
- collapse of the U-shaped temple tradition
- Las Haldas: stairway plastering job stopped halfway through
- leaving pegs and string in place
- never rebuilt again
- Cardal: painted clay and straw mannequin / deity left laying on the main staircase
- many other examples of unfinished projects, all apparently dating to roughly the same period
- Started building fortresses for the first time (or are they something else?)
- but people continued to live in villages and small towns of up to several thousand people
- warfare seems to have changed from rare or symbolic to real (but this is still being debated)
- Chanquillo
- an example of a fortress
- high, defensible point
- double round outer walls, baffled entries, limited interior space
- but some features aren't right
- not much storage, no water source...
- doors that could be barred from the outside
- some seem to "defend" bedrock outcrops
- maybe they are really some sort of ritual constructions, possibly related to tinku?
- other examples were rectangular or irregular in shape
- all in defensible locations
- typically have complex, baffled gates
- all have massive walls
- in any case, this is a radically different tradition
- together with adoption of maize, and changes in pottery and textile style, this architectural and ceremonial change is attributed to a powerful wave of influence from the highlands... but why, how, and what was it?
- Early Horizon 800-200 BC
- Chavín de Huantar
- setting: eastern side of the Andes, at a key point for travel from eastern slopes and jungle to highlands and Pacific coast
- The ceremonial center
- less than 1/10th the size of the Sechín Alto platform
- built in several episodes, first similar to a U-shaped temple with a sunken circular court, then expanded...
- Original "Old Temple" (900 BC - )
- A U-shaped platform with a sunken circular court, ringed by low-relief carvings
- honeycombed with corridors, drains, niches, tiny rooms
- Lanzón
- in the very center, in a cross-shaped gallery
- gallery above the chamber with a hole over the Lanzón: for speaking?
- analogy to Pachacamac, where the Spanish observed such a "speaking" deity in action
- Later (about 500 BC) added onto, forming the "New Temple" (Old Temple was part of it, still visible and in use)
- taller, with "Black and White Portal" covered with low reliefs
- and sunken rectangular court aligned in front of it
- additional galleries, stairways, etc., may have permitted ritual specialists to appear and disappear from view unexpectedly or otherwise put on a show for people in the rectangular court
- some carvings inside the New Temple retain traces of red, green, and blue pigments
- hinting that much more of Chavin might once have been painted in bright colors
- tennoned heads decorated the exterior
- they may show shamans/priests transforming from human to animal form
- possibly assisted by a hallucinogen
- one area of passages was filled with pottery, llama bone, guinea pig bone, fish bone, shell; thought to be offerings
- one contained burnt bone, including burnt human bone
- but human bone NOT found in domestic contexts (i.e. not dietary cannibalism)
- Please visit the Chavin photographic virtual reality website; this is part of the assigned "reading" for the course, but it is also very fun. Get there through the link on the class page.
- The town
- in Old Temple times (about 900 - 500 BC)
- 6 ha near and around the temple, on both sides of the Huachecsa river
- the river was crossed by a monolithic stone bridge that still carried trucks until it was destroyed by a landslide in 1945 (used for about 2500 years!)
- estimated around 500 people
- in New Temple times (500 BC to 200 BC)
- town gradually grew, reaching 42 hectares and 2,000 to 3,000 people by late in the Early Horizon
- at this maximum extent, it was some 20 times larger than the surrounding villages
- increasing evidence of trade
- exotic foods
- camelid meat brought in as dried jerky
- marine shell and fish bone from the coast
- increasing obsidian trade and Spondylus shell from Ecuadorian coast
- but the exotic goods were not particularly concentrated at the temple
- suggesting that, although the temple may have attracted travelers, it might not have been directly involved in all of the trade
- increasing evidence of craft production, maybe for trade
- shell bead workshop (using imported marine shell)
- wood or hide workshop
- stratification
- houses close to the temple and further away were excavated. The houses closer to the temple had:
- stone walls with niches, compared to the adobe walls of the houses farther away
- more foreign pottery
- more marine shell and fish bone
- the only gold artifact found in a residential area
- a higher fraction of young llamas among the bones
- that is, more preferred, tender meat
- i.e. probable status differentiation, with people associated with the temple living better than others
- Technological developments
- rapid development of goldworking technology
- prior to Chavín, there was only limited evidence of simple hammering of gold foil
- but in the Early Horizon, they mastered elaborate forming, soldering, repoussé, alloying gold and silver
- most examples are from the coast
- apparently from a limited number of rich burials with gold headdresses, gauntlets, pectorals, earspools, etc.
- these are the first burials of obviously high-status people
- adoption of numerous new textile technologies
- dyed wool (in addition to the older cotton textile tradition)
- tapestry weaving techniques
- painting, tie-dying, and batik
- Chavín influence in distant regions
- There were a few Chavin-like centers in the highlands, but all much smaller than Chavin de Huantar
- Chavín did NOT export carved stonework, nor pottery
- iconography and technology, rather than objects themselves, is what was widely dispersed
- most Chavín-style objects from the coast are portable
- and most seem to be drug paraphernalia
- small, decorated mortars and pestles
- decorated bone tubes
- bone and metal spatulas and spoons
- also ceramics in Chavin style
- Cache of painted textiles from a tomb at Karwa, on the Paracas peninsula
- at least 25 large paintings of the staff god, suitable for wall hangings or other form of display to large groups
- like at a travelling revival meeting?
- maybe Chavín was an oracle center, similar to the historically documented one at Pachacamac
- where the Spanish observed a wooden idol set up in a room atop a platform mound
- only high-status people could actually enter
- where they would put questions to the idol and a hidden priest would "speak" for it
- most people just watched ceremonies from the plaza at the foot of the steps
- shaman/priest would stand in front of the doorway in regalia and trance or perform for the audience
- the Pachacamac oracle had "sister", "son", and "wife" centers set up in other places, paying tithes to the main oracle
- notable that many of the Karwa "staff gods" have the sex indicated; when they do, it is always female
- i.e. a "wife" or "daughter" oracle of Chavín?
- generalities about the Early Horizon:
- stratification had finally appeared
- dietary, housing, ceramic differences with closeness to Chavín
- Gold-rich Cupisnique burials on the coast
- Karwa (Paracas) burial with quantities of painted textiles
- but settlements were still small
- little evidence of regional administrative or economic control
- and no "administrative centers" or hierarchy of site sizes
- no town walls or other defensive features
- no clear storage facilities for concentrating surplus
- instead, large regional influence in pottery, art styles
- proseletyzing religion?
- oracle center and sub-centers?
- increasing trade?
- The End of the Early Horizon, around 300-200 BC
- regional interaction faded
- many public buildings left unfinished
- one late style sculpture at Chavin was never finished; maybe it was part of the last project of an institution that was losing the ability to support specialists
- ordinary residences were built among and over the ceremonial structures
- at Chavín de Huantar and many other highland ritual sites
- ending the sacred uses of places that had been ritual centers for centuries or even millennia
- local styles of pottery developed, now much more varied than during the Early Horizon
- suggesting less interaction between neighboring groups
- the changes in iconography seem abrupt and drastic, not gradual
- indicating a rejection of Chavín ideas?
- possible increase in conflict and violence
- widespread construction of hilltop fortresses
- an immediately post-Chavín (Salinar culture) cemetery on the coast has many burials lacking limbs or heads, a pattern not seen before
- Richard Burger argues that the emergence of social stratification (presence of marked elites) during the Early Horizon meant that local societies could not just go back to their former egalitarian ways as Chavín influence declined
- The societal rules had fundamentally changed from the relatively egalitarian model of the Initial Period
- now there were elites who would work to advance their own interests
- group conflict was probably encouraged by competing elites and made more possible by their power
- this set the stage for the development of complex, stratified societies with classes and elites who would attain real economic and military power...