World Prehistory: Class 15
The Southwest: Hohokam, Mogollon, and Anasazi
© Copyright Bruce Owen 2000
- The setting: Southwest of US, northwest of Mexico
- mostly arid
- hot in lower elevations, high desert with cold winters and snow at higher elevations
- First inhabitants arrived around 9,000 BC, hunting big game in the immediate Post-Pleistocene (as far as we know!)
- mammoth, giant bison
- highly mobile
- As megafauna disappeared, they shifted to more diversified foraging
- Maize was adopted from Mexico between 2000 and 1000 BC, but it had little impact
- people continued mostly foraging, with small supplemental farming
- By 1 AD, people were settling down more and eating more farmed crops
- year-round dwellings
- ceramics (not very portable, good for boiling plant foods)
- metates and manos for grinding grain
- food storage structures
- in the higher, cooler, northern areas of the Southwest
- villages in defensible locations
- with specialized storage structures
- maybe because of pressures during harsh winters
- in the lower, hotter, southern desert areas
- villages of just houses in open, undefended spots
- maybe because of reliable crops near rivers
- typical dwellings were pithouses with mud-plastered superstructures
- three main ceramic/ethnic/etc. groups developed
- Hohokam in southern Arizona, northern Mexico low desert
- Anasazi in the high desert four corners area
- Mogollon near the Mogollon rim, edge of the high plateau in central Arizona, and in eastern Arizona/western New Mexico
- Hohokam
- in low desert
- "basin and range" terrain, divided by parallel mountain ranges
- little rainfall, very hot in summer
- saguaro, barrel, cholla, prickly pear cactus
- mesquite, etc. in washes
- by 300 AD, they were diverting river water into many canals to irrigate maize fields
- example Hohokam site: Snaketown
- located in the Phoenix basin
- near the confluence of the Gila and Salt rivers
- early stage, starting around 300 AD
- maybe 100 people living in pithouses
- arranged in pairs facing a common patio
- probably small family units
- maize agriculture plus foraged foods
- by 600 AD, many more villages, rising regional population
- Snaketown grew, reaching 1 square kilometer by its peak at 900 AD
- maybe 125 pithouses, holding 500 - 1000 people
- still arranged in groups around patios
- some still had only two houses, but others had up to six pithouses per patio
- but the houses tended to get smaller
- so the total size of the economic unit may not have changed much
- just divided into smaller, more private parts
- maybe a shift from more communal to more nuclear family living arrangements
- larger patios also had one square structure (rest were oblong rectangles)
- possibly a special-purpose building: shrine? men's house? etc.
- they began to build ball courts, including one at Snaketown
- oval depressions 60 m (195 feet) long, with sloping sides 4.5-6 m high (15-20 feet)
- a ritual "game" also played in mesoamerica
- based on Spanish observations, mesoamerican art, etc:
- a team sport
- had to hit a rubber ball without using hands
- some versions had a hoop to hit the ball through
- losers sometime sacrificed!
- rubber balls found at Snaketown, similar to mesoamerican ones
- this and other ties to mesoamerican traditions has suggested to some that contact with the south was crucial to the development of complex Hohokam society
- others think that this contact was secondary to an essentially local development
- platform mounds of adobe and dirt fill
- one is 29 m x 23 m, and 3 m tall (95 x 75 feet, 10 feet tall)
- plastered with clay or caliche (natural lime)
- probably had ceremonial structures on top
- complex site layout
- central plaza with dwellings around it
- surrounded by 60 mounds and two ball courts
- more habitation beyond these
- larger patios tended to be near the center of town, near the platforms and a central plaza
- suggesting that large domestic units were of high status
- maybe they could mobilize more labor for farming, craft production, defense, etc.
- Snaketown and similar large towns with ballcourts and platforms presumably served the ritual needs of smaller, surrounding villages without them.
- craft specialization
- ceramics
- shell work
- material from Gulf of California
- bracelets, beads, pendants, rings, etched ornaments
- stone work: beads, earspools, ornaments, axes, sculptural vessels
- exchange
- rubber, shell, jewelry stones, copper ornaments etc., many from the more complex societies further south in Mexico
- yet still relatively minor status differences in residences and burials
- biggest canal systems were north of Snaketown on the Salt river
- largest extent of irrigation was probably reached after 800 AD, coinciding with the maximum size of Snaketown
- 14 main canals up to 20 kilometers (12.5 miles) long
- two examples near Phoenix were several meters wide, 60 cm deep
- hundreds of secondary canals
- allowing the irrigation of areas as much as 50 km long along the edges of the rivers
- ethnohistorical analogies in the US Southwest and the Andean coast suggest that systems like these can be run by up to several thousand people without too much coercion or administration
- but probably a lot of arguing!
- canal systems declined around 1150 AD
- maybe due to a global warm period
- Snaketown and other sites were abandoned
- many people moved out of the Gila river basin, apparently to the Salt river basin
- dwellings changed from pithouses to above-ground apartment blocks
- possibly for defense in times of scarcity
- some were several stories tall
- others were located on top of mounds, presumably for high-status families
- suggesting some change in organization
- both more communal
- and more stratified
- by 1500's, all these sites were abandoned, and local mobile foragers had no memory of their occupants
- Mogollon
- very roughly similar to Hohokam
- known especially for their beautiful ceramics
- lacking a clear story to tell about them yet, we won't do more than mention them here...
- Anasazi
- a widespread culture; we will focus on one dramatic variant within the larger Anasazi region
- Chaco Canyon
- in Northwestern New Mexico
- on the Colorado Plateau
- in one of the largest valleys cut into the high plain (over 1500 m / 5,000 ft)
- dry, only occasional, strong rains often causing flash floods in washes
- farmed by building low walls to catch the runoff, concentrate it, and direct it in channels to fields
- called "floodwater farming"
- 100 AD: mobile foragers began to settle down, building the first permanent Anasazi sites
- 5-10 pithouses
- in defensible positions on top of mesas
- gradual increase in dependence on maize-beans-squash farming
- but still a lot of foraging
- piñon nuts
- rabbits, deer, antelope, etc.
- 500 AD: probably permanent villages on the valley floor
- some villages got up to 50 or 100 pithouses
- 3-7.5 m diamter (10-24 feet)
- roofed with logs supported by posts, roof plastered with mud
- interior walls plastered with mud or faced with stone
- access by a ramp or vestibule
- began to build kivas
- circular sunken roofed ceremonial structures
- Anasazi pottery style developed
- example: Shabik'eschee village, 550 - 750 AD
- up to 68 pithouses
- but many robbed to build others
- so only a fraction in use at any given time
- storage pits
- one kiva
- 700 AD: Anasazi started building above-ground masonry dwelling blocks
- maybe these were originally storage structures, with people still living in pithouses?
- developed into consolidated blocks of rooms, some for residences, some storage, some ceremonial
- mostly close to farmland (no surprise...)
- may coincide with a wetter period in which Chaco Canyon was more productive
- 900 AD: structures got larger, turned into full-on apartment buildings or "pueblos" (called "Great Houses")
- at least 9 Great Houses in Chaco Canyon
- hundreds of rooms each
- huge, up to four stories tall
- at least roughly planned, not just random accretions of rooms
- large portions were built at once, with uniform masonry style
- that is, expansion happened as coordinated, large projects
- one or more Great Kivas, multiple smaller kivas
- probably derived from the pithouses of earlier times
- example: Pueblo Bonito
- 160 x 100 m (525 x 325 ft)
- D-shaped plan
- front is the flat side
- over 800 rooms stepped up to the curved high back wall
- rooms opening to outside had most air and light, were used for living, while interior rooms were for storage
- up to 1000 people lived in Pueblo Bonito
- debate about whether some rooms were abandoned while others were still being built, or if the whole thing was used at once
- precisely dated (and construction sequence analyzed) using tree-ring dates
- first built around 919 AD
- last construction around 1115 AD
- 196 years of building episodes, mostly in large bursts
- apparently lots of trees cut in short episodes, stored for use in construction
- construction is well-laid stone facing with rubble core
- also smaller villages of 10-20 rooms each
- 1020-1130 AD: peak of Chaco system
- at least 125 Chacoan villages
- "roads" radiating out from Chaco Canyon
- mostly dead straight, sometimes with kinks
- some with stone edging
- including stairways up rocky parts
- up to 190 km (120 miles) long
- some go to Chacoan towns, others have unknown purposes
- probably not just for travel, but also for some ritual processions or other non-obvious purposes
- lots of exchange and movement of goods
- wood beams from 80 km (50 miles) away
- turquoise, jet, shell, pyrite, colorful feathers, cast copper bells (probably from northern Mexico) imported from distant sources
- and especially concentrated in the larger villages
- suggesting that size really did indicate higher status people living there
- but still no strong indications in burials or residences of a significantly elite class
- around 1100 AD, the Chacoan system began to decline
- population and construction declined, although not abruptly
- Chaco canyon was fully abandoned by around 1300 AD
- this coincides with a global warm period, which may have shifted rainfall enough to make Chaco unattractive or unable to support a large population
- people apparently moved to higher elevations with more rainfall
- and to defensible locations like the cliff dwellings of Mesa Verde
- which were occupied by people with a late variant of the Anasazi culture
- the cliff dwellings presumably were a response to a rise in conflict, maybe associated with food scarcity
- although there are other suggested explanations
- 1300 AD: the remaining pueblos were mostly abandoned, and most people had returned to a more mobile lifestyle
- which is what the first Spanish visitors mostly saw