World Prehistory: Class 14
Great Zimbabwe
© Copyright Bruce Owen 2000
- The first European to visit Great Zimbabwe was a German geologist, Carl Mauch, in 1871. He said:
- "I do not think that I am far wrong if I suppose that the ruin on the hill is a copy of Solomon's Temple on Mount Moriah and the building in the plain of copy of the palace where the Queen of Sheba lived during her visit to Solomon."
- Setting of Zimbabwe Plateau
- physical setting
- high plateau, mostly over 1000 m elevation (3,250 feet)
- on eastern edge of Kalahari desert, bounded to east by a scarp dropping to the coastal plain and the Indian Ocean
- rolling plains with granite outcrops
- some deeply incised river valleys
- ecology/agriculture
- very variable soil, from rich to poor
- in general, trees scattered in grassy savanna
- cool, plenty of rain; an attractive environment
- good pasturage for cattle and sheep
- good conditions for sorghum, millet, beans, and squash
- relatively frequent "bad" years, maybe one in five, call for risk-minimizing strategies like keeping large herds, or...?
- the eastern portion, where the Zimbabwe-type sites are, is for climatic regions an "island" free of tsetse flies, which in surrounding areas kill both livestock and people
- Their bite transmits trypanosomes, a category of protozoan blood parasites, which cause "sleeping sickness" and other diseases
- sleeping sickness causes fever, protracted lethargy, tremors, loss of weight, and death
- other resources
- gold, both alluvial and hard-rock "quartz reefs"
- lots of "ancient" mines found in the European gold rush of 1894
- 1267 pre-European workings known, mostly destroyed by recent mining
- vertical, sloping, and horizontal shafts, up to 25 m (81 feet) deep!
- also iron, copper, and tin (essential for making bronze, and highly valued)
- granite with a characteristic way of fracturing into flat slabs (exfoliation caused by humidity and freezing, as at Yosemite)
- exfoliation could also be caused artificially by lighting a fire on the surface, then dousing it with water
- clay called "daga" suited to building; dries to a cement-like hardness
- soapstone for carvings
- elephants for ivory
- Dating
- Much more recent than anything we have looked at so far
- Portuguese merchants had trading posts along the Zambezi river to the north; they got second-hand information in the early 1500s clearly describing Great Zimbabwe and indicating that it was already abandoned and the locals did not know who built it
- people built these stone structures from about 1250 AD to 1450 AD.
- 300's AD: First farmers settled in the area
- grinding equipment suggests grain farming, probably sorghum and millet
- sheep and goats
- still some hunting and foraging, as expectable
- permanent villages in non-defensible locations
- already making iron tools locally in many villages
- arrow points, knives, beads, rings
- note that subsaharan African technology had gone straight from neolithic to iron age, without intervening period using copper and bronze
- plus limited use of copper for beads and ornaments
- occasional glass beads, marine shell suggest broad exchange networks that already moved goods from the east coast and elsewhere to the interior
- 1000 -1250 AD: Leopard's Kopje culture
- this culture was apparently that of cattle pastoralists who moved in from the south
- cattle are good stores of wealth
- easily counted, evaluated, bought, and sold
- easy to move around
- pastoralists commonly develop considerable variations in wealth
- farming continued
- with addition of bananas, introduced from Indonesia via Arab sea traders
- the Leopard's Kopje culture seems to have been directly ancestral to that of the inhabitants of the Great Enclosure
- 1250 - 1450 AD Great Zimbabwe
- Some authors call the builders of Great Zimbabwe "Karanga", after the later, historical group in the region
- the builders of Great Zimbabwe were clearly their ancestors, but not everyone agrees with considering them the same culture and polity
- Zimbabwe building style
- dry stone walls (that is, stones are stacked without mortar)
- relatively wide and low
- sites may have one to several enclosures
- may be carefully coursed dressed stone, or poorly coursed raw rock
- "courses" are the horizontal rows of stones or bricks in masonry
- sometimes has decorative chevron, herringbone, etc. patterns, or bands of darker colored stone
- often with pillars or stelae (tall, standing stones)
- elaborate doorways extended by "bastions" on inside, with curved steps to a raised threshold
- the stone enclosures usually had daga structures with thatch roofs inside
- daga was molded into decorative patterns and finished to a hard, almost polished surface
- many of the stone walls may have been daga-plastered up to about 2 m high
- often the smaller stone walls connected circular daga huts, forming courtyards
- so to understand the plan, you have to add the now-melted huts back into the gaps between the standing stone wall segments
- Great Zimbabwe
- by far the largest of the Zimbabwe-type sites
- hilltop "Hill Ruin" or "Acropolis"
- clustered around boulders atop the precipitous hill
- mostly small enclosures separated by narrow, twisting passages
- also the "Western Enclosure" at one end, with walls 9 m (29 feet) high, with turrets and monoliths
- contained a long sequence of daga structures
- 4 m deep of accumulated deposits
- room for estimated 14 houses (i.e. a small group of high-status people or families)
- the smaller "Eastern Enclosure"
- decorative wall enclosing a steep slope that had been terraced
- on the terraces were stood many soapstone bird stelae and other monoliths
- presumably for ritual purposes
- Great Enclosure
- maximum diameter 89 m (290 feet) (almost a football field)
- outer wall up to 5 m thick and 10 m high (16 feet thick X 32 feet high)
- some inner walls may be earlier, indicating expansion work
- contains the solid conical tower, 5.5 m diameter, 9 m high (18 feet D X 29 feet high)
- also contained daga structures
- extensive area of densely packed huts outside the Great Enclosure
- numerous smaller enclosures scattered around
- population estimated around 5,000 adults, or 10,000 to 18,000 people!
- image of packed huts with smooth clay walls and thatched roofs, hanging smoke, landscape trampled bare and dusty, lots of cattle and flies...
- other sites
- Great Zimbabwe is NOT a unique site, although it is the biggest of its type; there are many others
- estimated 150 ruins in Zimbabwe and following Khami style still exist
- estimated up to 50 more were destroyed since 1890s.
- still more have been found outside the Zimbabwe Plateau
- stone enclosures around daga houses, probably for ten to thirty people maximum
- probably these were upper class, with common people living around and partially supporting them
- in one case (few have been excavated), one daga structure seemed to be an audience hall, with a place for an important person to sit, backed by symbols of authority in an attached, secluded room
- pottery tended to be fancy, with a high proportion of imports
- pottery was mostly liquid serving vessels, not cooking or food serving
- that is, these "houses" inside the stone walls were apparently used for a lot of drinking from showy, expensive vessels, not domestic activities
- the outlying daga houses have been noted but not excavated
- except in one case (Manekweni)
- the bones in garbage from inside the enclosure were dominated by cattle bones
- remember, in a cattle pastoralist society, beef = wealth
- while the bones in garbage from outside were dominated by sheep, goat, and game
- also suggestions now of smaller sites without any stone architecture
- indicates a settlement hierarchy, from capital to secondary center to agricultural village
- i.e. a state!
- subsistence
- cattle, sheep, goat pastoralism
- livestock may have been more for storage (risk management) and accumulation of negotiable wealth
- bone from the slopes below the "Acropolis" was overwhelmingly cattle, with a little sheep or goat
- over 75% killed while still immature: i.e. veal
- at several other sites, similar patterns: mostly cattle, a little sheep or goat and occasional game
- but note, these are always the people living in stone enclosures: the elite
- may also have to do with rituals by the elite
- carbonized seeds show use of
- grains: sorghum, millet
- various beans, peas ("cowpeas" = black-eye peas)
- livestock may have been more for storage (risk management) and accumulation of negotiable wealth
- craft production
- mining (see above)
- metalwork at Great Zimbabwe: gold, copper, bronze, iron
- iron most developed
- hoes, axes, spear and arrow points, knives, etc.
- iron gongs
- copper, bronze, and gold used for decorative items
- coiled wire bracelets, beads, etc.
- done in certain enclosures only, suggesting specialized production, maybe under some form of control
- pottery
- soapstone carving (bowls, stelae, figurines, molds, etc.)
- spindle whorls suggest spinning (cotton) and weaving
- i.e. probably some occupational specialization
- trade
- imports
- glass beads (at least one cache of tens of thousands!)
- glass vessels from Southwest Asia
- Persian and Chinese ceramics, 13th-14th century
- brass wire (brass was not made locally; it requires zinc)
- a coin from Kilwa (an Arab town on the coast)
- i.e. trade via east coast
- also extensive trade network within Africa
- large amounts of iron (one cache of 30 kg of iron wire, 100 kg of hoes, axes, and chisels)
- copper ingots from the northern part of the plateau
- cowrie shells from the coast
- styles and techniques from remote areas
- social stratification
- housing differences
- density of houses outside the enclosures 3 times that of houses inside
- diet differences at Manekweni (cattle inside, sheep/goat outside)
- diet of young cattle at Acropolis of Great Zimbabwe
- ability to control labor to build stone walls
- elite goods found within enclosures
- imported ceramics, glass, brass (see above)
- some in huge caches, as in 10s of thousands of glass beads
- gold
- copper, bronze
- soapstone
- lack of cooking vessels and grinding stones (i.e. few domestic activities inside)
- almost total emphasis on liquid storage and drinking vessels
- total estimated population of all known stone enclosures: 750, vs. tens of thousands living outside
- Explanations for the rise of Great Zimbabwe
- Suggestion that it was based on gold trade with the outside, world market. According to this view:
- hard-rock gold mining developed around 1000 AD
- as a response to the large demand for gold and goods traded for it by the outside world, which was already organized on a state and market scheme
- through Arab traders on the east coast
- This trade could be controlled by existing leaders, who became wealthier and more powerful, creating the Zimbabwe state.
- Evidence for this view:
- Great Zimbabwe appeared just when Arab trading was picking up on the East Coast
- and it was abandoned just when the East Coast trading centers and the Arab trade declined
- suggests a close economic relationship
- i.e. "The Zimbabwe Culture can be described as an indigenous reaction to an external stimulus--the East Coast gold trade" (Huffman 1977 in Connah 1987)
- lots of evidence of trade
- huge amount of gold extracted from the region
- "conservative" estimates of 7 to 9 million ounces of gold before 1890
- at current price ($382/oz), that is 2.6 to 3.4 BILLION dollars
- most of this probably dates to the time of Great Zimbabwe, and much of it would have passed through there.
- Imagine the impact of this much wealth on a pastoral economy!
- And this says nothing of the parallel trades in ivory, textiles, and probably other goods.
- undoubtedly trade is not the entire explanation, but it must have played a big role
- quite possibly an essential one
- external trade may have allowed a flourishing of an already existing internal trade network
- suggestion that Great Zimbabwe was based as much on transhumant cattle pastoralism (using the coastal plain, then retreating in the tsetse fly season) as on gold
- cattle were easy to trade and count
- ritual/religion probably played a role, although difficult to say it was causal
- Note that despite the walls, warfare is NOT suggested as important
- most sites are not in particularly defensible positions
- simple entrances have no specifically defensive features
- no preponderance of weapons
- no evidence of barracks, etc.
- This is in contrast to many, if not most, other states around the world, including other African ones
- 1450 - 1700s
- Great Zimbabwe was abandoned
- the kingdom continued as the historical Mwene Mutapa, a division of the Karanga
- centered to the north, along the Zambezi river
- known because they traded with the Portuguese starting in the 1500s.
- the ancestors of the modern Shona
- stonework continued in the south-western part of the plateau
- extensive terracing, decorative retaining walls, drains, etc.
- Explaining the decline of Great Zimbabwe
- probably due to overuse of the landscape
- increasing distance to firewood
- exhaustion of soil
- depletion of wildlife
- and shifting trade circumstances
- the decline of the gold trade due to falling world prices and depletion of easily exploited sources
- possibly the shift to more demand for copper, available to the north