Introduction to Archaeology
Midterm study guide
You should be able to explain and use the terms and concepts listed below. That means that you can answer questions about them, and that you can include them when relevant in answering other questions. For example, a question that presents a hypothetical archaeological excavation and asks you to answer a question about it might involve using the concepts of strata, superposition, association, terminus post quem, diagnostic artifacts, components, and so on.
Those listed on the handout: History and Theory of Archaeology - Concepts
Those listed on the handout: What you should know about absolute dating
Those listed on the handout: How radiocarbon dating works
Relative dating
Steno's law, or the Law of Superposition
Stratigraphy
Stratum (plural: strata)
Feature
Association
Curation
Redeposition
Intrusion (or intrusive)
Inverted stratigraphy
"Natural" or cultural strata
Arbitrary strata
Erosion
Deposition
Understand and interpret stratigraphy in profile views and plan views
Be able to figure out the order of deposition of strata or features in a profile drawing
Be able to interpret the dating and associations of artifacts found in strata or features indicated on a profile drawing (like "A coin dated 1827 was found at point A in the profile shown; what can you say about the date at which wall B was built?")
Be able to discuss some issues surrounding artifact typologies, or to comment on the strengths and weaknesses of a given hypothetical typology in a given situation
Temporal types
Diagnostic artifacts
Seriation: Be able to explain the theoretical justification for the method, and be able to seriate a small number of sites or artifacts, given the necessary information about them.
Battleship curve
Component; single-component site; multi-component site
Occupation (in the sense of "the Roman occupation of London"
Phase
Period
Culture (in the chronological and spatial sense used by archaeologists)
Cultural chronology
Culture history
Archaeological survey
Be able to explain a number of ways that archaeologists find sites
Systematic site survey
Settlement pattern
Preliminary or reconnaissance survey
100% or full-coverage survey
Surface collection
Shovel tests, post-hole samples, auger samples
Sampling strategies
Judgment samples
Systematic samples
Random samples
Stratified random samples
Transects
Settlement pattern analysis:
Catchment analysis
Thiessen polygons
Site size hierarchies
Rank-size diagrams
Primate settlement hierarchy
Nearest-neighbor analysis (understand the concept; I don't expect you to do the math)
Central Place Theory models
Be able to draw reasonable conclusions about subsistence practices, social organization, and other themes from a map showing the locations of archaeological sites, using simple inspection and/or any of the approaches listed above
If given an example of one of the settlement pattern analyses listed above, be able to recognize, name, and explain the logic behind it
Know a little about the uses and methods of site mapping; be able to draw some basic conclusions from a site map ("the houses were here and the temple was there...")
Theodolite and stadia rod
Total station
GPS
Know a little about the uses and methods of surface collections; be able to draw some basic conclusions from a map showing surface collection data ("looks like the poor folks lived here and the wealthy ones lived there...")
Sampling strategies for surface collections (basically the same as for site surveying)
Limitations and problems in interpreting surface collections (especially poor visibility, multicomponent sites)
Noninvasive archaeological methods or remote sensing
Aerial photography - what sorts of things it can detect (crop marks, relief, vegetation...)
Soil resistivity
Ground-penetrating radar
Magnetometry
Also, you should be able to explain a number of ways to evaluate the credibility of information (archaeological or otherwise) from the web.